Mackenzie Cadenhead & Daniel J. Buckley 44 Oakdale Drive (Deferred from June Meeting) Relief from the strict application of Section 295-20.F and 295-68.F.(1)(a) of the Village Code for a single story addition to their home on a corner lot at 44 Oakdale Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL:4.20-16-1 on the Village tax Maps. Variances sought are as follows: 1. Front Yard on Oakdale Avenue: Proposed for the addition – 23.29 ft.; Required min. - 30 ft. {295-68.F.(1)(a)} 2. Side Yard on Hollywood Drive: Proposed for the addition – 13.46 ft.; Required min. for a corner lot – 30 ft. {295-55.A and 295-68.F.(1)(a)}
Jean-Pierre Boudrias & Phaong Sara Ho 21 Calumet Avenue (Deferred from June Meeting) Relief from the strict application of Section 295-55.A and 295-68.F.(1)(c) and 295-68.F.(1)(d) of the Village Code for the additions and alterations to their home at 21 Calumet Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-29-3 on the Village tax Maps. Variances sought are as follows: 1. Extension of a non-conformity - Side Yard: Min. on one side and total of two sides: Existing and proposed – 4.5 ft. and 29.1 ft.; Required min. - 12 ft. and 30 ft. {295-55.A and 295-68.F. (1)(c)} 2. Building Height – Number of stories: Proposed – Addition of a third story on an existing two story portion of the house; Permitted max.: – 2 ½ stories {295-68.F.(1)(d)}
Kristin & Daniel Wyatt 7 Edmarth Place (May be Deferred Pending Action by Planning Board) Relief from the strict application of code sections 295-55.A.; 295-70.E.(3)(a)[1] & [2] and 295-70.E.(1) (c) as for the addition and alterations to their home at 7 Edmarth Place. Said property is located in the R2 zoning district and is known as SBL: 4.30-20-21 on the Village Tax Maps. Variances sought are as follows: 1. Total of two side yards: Proposed for the addition – 19.67 ft;. Required min. 20 ft. {295- 70.E.(1)(c)} 2. Extension of existing non-conformity - Lot Coverage: Existing – 37.18%; Proposed – 37.75%; Permitted max. – 30% {295-55.A.and 295-70.E.(3)(a)[1]} 3. Extension of existing non-conformity - Development Coverage: Existing – 48.08%; Proposed – 49.37%; Permitted max. – 40% {295-55.A.and 95-70.E.(3)(a)[2]}
Mackenzie Cadenhead & Daniel J. Buckley 44 Oakdale Drive (Deferred from June Meeting) Relief from the strict application of Section 295-20.F and 295-68.F.(1)(a) of the Village Code for a single story addition to their home on a corner lot at 44 Oakdale Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL:4.20-16-1 on the Village tax Maps. Variances sought are as follows: 1. Front Yard on Oakdale Avenue: Proposed for the addition – 23.29 ft.; Required min. - 30 ft. {295-68.F.(1)(a)} 2. Side Yard on Hollywood Drive: Proposed for the addition – 13.46 ft.; Required min. for a corner lot – 30 ft. {295-55.A and 295-68.F.(1)(a)}
Jean-Pierre Boudrias & Phaong Sara Ho 21 Calumet Avenue (Deferred from June Meeting) Relief from the strict application of Section 295-55.A and 295-68.F.(1)(c) and 295-68.F.(1)(d) of the Village Code for the additions and alterations to their home at 21 Calumet Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-29-3 on the Village tax Maps. Variances sought are as follows: 1. Extension of a non-conformity - Side Yard: Min. on one side and total of two sides: Existing and proposed – 4.5 ft. and 29.1 ft.; Required min. - 12 ft. and 30 ft. {295-55.A and 295-68.F. (1)(c)} 2. Building Height – Number of stories: Proposed – Addition of a third story on an existing two story portion of the house; Permitted max.: – 2 ½ stories {295-68.F.(1)(d)}
Kristin & Daniel Wyatt 7 Edmarth Place (May be Deferred Pending Action by Planning Board) Relief from the strict application of code sections 295-55.A.; 295-70.E.(3)(a)[1] & [2] and 295-70.E.(1) (c) as for the addition and alterations to their home at 7 Edmarth Place. Said property is located in the R2 zoning district and is known as SBL: 4.30-20-21 on the Village Tax Maps. Variances sought are as follows: 1. Total of two side yards: Proposed for the addition – 19.67 ft;. Required min. 20 ft. {295- 70.E.(1)(c)} 2. Extension of existing non-conformity - Lot Coverage: Existing – 37.18%; Proposed – 37.75%; Permitted max. – 30% {295-55.A.and 295-70.E.(3)(a)[1]} 3. Extension of existing non-conformity - Development Coverage: Existing – 48.08%; Proposed – 49.37%; Permitted max. – 40% {295-55.A.and 95-70.E.(3)(a)[2]}