Case No. 09-15 Malcolm Beadling 19 William Street View Preservation approval as required under section 295-82 and relief from the strict application of code sections 295-55.A, and 295-72.E.(1)(c) of the Village Code for the addition of a roof top deck to their multi-family dwelling at 19 William Street. Said property is located in the MR-1.5 Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.70-53-14 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for the extension of an Existing Non-conformity: Side Yard: Existing and Proposed for the deck – approx.6.4 ft.; Required min. – 16.5 ft. {295-55.A. and 295-72.E.(1)(c)} View Preservation approval & side yard variance of 10.1 ft. is being sought.
Case No. 10-15 John Bindella & Michael Pagliuca 457 Warburton Avenue Relief from the strict application of code sections 295-72.1,E.(1)(b&c) and 295-72.1,E.(3) of the Village Code for the addition of three rear decks to their multi-family dwelling at 457 Warburton Avenue. Said property is located in the MR-O Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.70-52-24 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for rear & side yard setbacks and lot coverage: Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed – Existing 30.25 ft.; Proposed approx. 22.25 ft.; Required min. – 30ft. {295-72.E.(1)(b)} Side Yard 1: Existing and Proposed – approx. 1.5 ft.; Required min. – 14.7 ft. {295-72.E.(1)(c)} Side Yard 2: Existing and Proposed – approx. 3.3 ft.; Required min. – 14.7 ft. {295-72.E.(1)(c)} Lot Coverage: Existing and Proposed – Existing 47.9%; Proposed 55% coverage; Required max – 50% coverage Variance details: Rear yard – 7.75’; Side yard #1 – 13.2’; Side yard #2-11.4’ and Coverage – 5%
Case No. 11-15 Davis Bowen & Bennett Rink 1 Flower Avenue Relief from the strict application of the Village code Section 295-68F.1.a & b, and 295-20.C.2 for construction of a new one & two story side/rear additions and a rear stone patio at their home at 1 Flower Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.20-9-5 on the Village Tax Maps. Non-conformity details of the additions and rear patio are as follows: Side/rear additions: Front Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 25.7 ft.; Proposed – 21.1ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.a}; Variance required – 8.9 ft. Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 14 ft.; Proposed – 6.9ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.b}; Variance required – 23.1 ft. Rear stone patio: Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 14ft.; Proposed – 0 ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. no paving in required yards {295-20.C.2}; Variance required – 30 ft.
Case No. 14-15 Marisa & Mario Fruscante 95 Kent Avenue Relief from the strict application of the Village code Sections 295-68.F.1.a & c, 295-68.F.2.a [2], 295-20.F and 295-55.A, for the second story addition and front porch extension to their single family dwelling at 95 Kent Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.120-133-1 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for the extension of existing nonconformities: Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in front yard on a corner lot: Existing – 25.1 ft.; Proposed – 25.1ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295-68.F.1.a and 295-55.A}; Variance required – 4.9 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in side yard 1 on a corner lot: Existing – 17.4 ft.; Proposed – 17.4 ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295-68.F.1.c, 295-55.A and 295-20.F.}; Variance required – 12.6 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in side yard 2: Existing – 7.5 ft.; Proposed – 7.5 ft.; Required Min. – 12 ft. {295-68.F.1.c, 295-55.A and 295-20.F.}; Variance required – 5.5 ft. Developmental Coverage: Existing – 37%; Proposed – 38%; Required Max. - 35% {295-68.F.2.a [2]}; Variance required – 3%
Case No. 15-15 Christopher Dudko & Katherine Booth 514 Broadway Relief from the strict application of the Village code Sections 295-69.F.1.a, b & c and 295-55.A, for the second story and two story addition and front porch extension to their single family dwelling at 514 Broadway. Said property is in R-7.5 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-46-6 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for the nonconformities and extension of existing nonconformity: Nonconformity for front porch extension in front yard: Existing – 8.7 ft.; Proposed – 1.7 ft.; Required Min. – 25 ft. {295-69.F.1.a}; Variance required – 23.3 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in rear yard: Existing – 13 ft.; Proposed – 11.6 ft.; Required Min. – 25 ft. {295-69.F.1.b and 295-55.A.}; Variance required – 13.4 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in side yard 1: Existing – 4.7 ft.; Proposed – 4.7 ft.; Required Min. – 12 ft. {295-69.F.1.c and 295-55.A}; Variance required – 7.3 ft.
Case No. 12-15 Spencer & Sarah Orkus 42 Villard Avenue Relief from the strict application of the Village code Section 295-68F.1.a & c, 295-68F.2.a [1] & [2], 295-20.B.6 and 295-55A for construction of a new front portico, side second story addition and rear wood deck at their home at 42 Villard Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-37-7 on the Village Tax Maps. Nonconformity details of the proposed portico, additions and deck are as follows: Front Portico: Front Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 20.1 ft.; Proposed – 15.8 ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.a}; Variance required – 14.2 ft. Side second story addition: Front Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 24 ft.; Proposed – 24ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.a}; Variance required – 6 ft. Side Yard 2: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 8.6 ft.; Proposed – 8.6ft.; Required Min. – Two sides equaling 30’, each of which is at least 12’ {295 - 68F.1.c}; Variance required – 9.4 ft. Prohibition against extension of nonconformity {295-55.A} Rear wood deck: Side yard 1: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 5.4 ft.; Proposed – 5.4.; Required Min. – 6’ or ½ the distance of the projection into the setback (6’), whichever is least {295-20.B.6}; Variance require – .6 ft. Building Coverage: Existing and Proposed: Existing - 22.6%; Proposed - 25.6%; Required Maximum – 25% {295 – 68F.2.a [1]}; Variance required – 6/10% Developmental Coverage: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 42.9%; Proposed – 46.5%; Required Maximum – 35% {295 – 68F.2.a [2]}; Variance required – 11.5%
Case No. 13-15 Margaret Walker & Clement Paulsen 52 Buena Vista Drive Relief from the strict application of the Village code Section 295-68F.1.b & c, for construction of a new rear vestibule/kitchen addition, at their home at 52 Buena Vista Drive. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-43-29 on the Village Tax Maps. Non-conformity details of the proposed rear vestibule/kitchen addition are as follows: Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 20.1 ft.; Proposed – 17.4 ft.; Required Min. – 30% of lot depth, 28.5 ft. {295 - 68F.1.b}; Variance required - 11.1 ft.
Case No. 09-15 Malcolm Beadling 19 William Street View Preservation approval as required under section 295-82 and relief from the strict application of code sections 295-55.A, and 295-72.E.(1)(c) of the Village Code for the addition of a roof top deck to their multi-family dwelling at 19 William Street. Said property is located in the MR-1.5 Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.70-53-14 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for the extension of an Existing Non-conformity: Side Yard: Existing and Proposed for the deck – approx.6.4 ft.; Required min. – 16.5 ft. {295-55.A. and 295-72.E.(1)(c)} View Preservation approval & side yard variance of 10.1 ft. is being sought.
Case No. 10-15 John Bindella & Michael Pagliuca 457 Warburton Avenue Relief from the strict application of code sections 295-72.1,E.(1)(b&c) and 295-72.1,E.(3) of the Village Code for the addition of three rear decks to their multi-family dwelling at 457 Warburton Avenue. Said property is located in the MR-O Zoning District and is known as SBL: 4.70-52-24 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for rear & side yard setbacks and lot coverage: Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed – Existing 30.25 ft.; Proposed approx. 22.25 ft.; Required min. – 30ft. {295-72.E.(1)(b)} Side Yard 1: Existing and Proposed – approx. 1.5 ft.; Required min. – 14.7 ft. {295-72.E.(1)(c)} Side Yard 2: Existing and Proposed – approx. 3.3 ft.; Required min. – 14.7 ft. {295-72.E.(1)(c)} Lot Coverage: Existing and Proposed – Existing 47.9%; Proposed 55% coverage; Required max – 50% coverage Variance details: Rear yard – 7.75’; Side yard #1 – 13.2’; Side yard #2-11.4’ and Coverage – 5%
Case No. 11-15 Davis Bowen & Bennett Rink 1 Flower Avenue Relief from the strict application of the Village code Section 295-68F.1.a & b, and 295-20.C.2 for construction of a new one & two story side/rear additions and a rear stone patio at their home at 1 Flower Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.20-9-5 on the Village Tax Maps. Non-conformity details of the additions and rear patio are as follows: Side/rear additions: Front Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 25.7 ft.; Proposed – 21.1ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.a}; Variance required – 8.9 ft. Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 14 ft.; Proposed – 6.9ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.b}; Variance required – 23.1 ft. Rear stone patio: Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 14ft.; Proposed – 0 ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. no paving in required yards {295-20.C.2}; Variance required – 30 ft.
Case No. 14-15 Marisa & Mario Fruscante 95 Kent Avenue Relief from the strict application of the Village code Sections 295-68.F.1.a & c, 295-68.F.2.a [2], 295-20.F and 295-55.A, for the second story addition and front porch extension to their single family dwelling at 95 Kent Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.120-133-1 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for the extension of existing nonconformities: Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in front yard on a corner lot: Existing – 25.1 ft.; Proposed – 25.1ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295-68.F.1.a and 295-55.A}; Variance required – 4.9 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in side yard 1 on a corner lot: Existing – 17.4 ft.; Proposed – 17.4 ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295-68.F.1.c, 295-55.A and 295-20.F.}; Variance required – 12.6 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in side yard 2: Existing – 7.5 ft.; Proposed – 7.5 ft.; Required Min. – 12 ft. {295-68.F.1.c, 295-55.A and 295-20.F.}; Variance required – 5.5 ft. Developmental Coverage: Existing – 37%; Proposed – 38%; Required Max. - 35% {295-68.F.2.a [2]}; Variance required – 3%
Case No. 15-15 Christopher Dudko & Katherine Booth 514 Broadway Relief from the strict application of the Village code Sections 295-69.F.1.a, b & c and 295-55.A, for the second story and two story addition and front porch extension to their single family dwelling at 514 Broadway. Said property is in R-7.5 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-46-6 on the Village Tax Maps. Variance is sought for the nonconformities and extension of existing nonconformity: Nonconformity for front porch extension in front yard: Existing – 8.7 ft.; Proposed – 1.7 ft.; Required Min. – 25 ft. {295-69.F.1.a}; Variance required – 23.3 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in rear yard: Existing – 13 ft.; Proposed – 11.6 ft.; Required Min. – 25 ft. {295-69.F.1.b and 295-55.A.}; Variance required – 13.4 ft. Extension of nonconformity for second story addition in side yard 1: Existing – 4.7 ft.; Proposed – 4.7 ft.; Required Min. – 12 ft. {295-69.F.1.c and 295-55.A}; Variance required – 7.3 ft.
Case No. 12-15 Spencer & Sarah Orkus 42 Villard Avenue Relief from the strict application of the Village code Section 295-68F.1.a & c, 295-68F.2.a [1] & [2], 295-20.B.6 and 295-55A for construction of a new front portico, side second story addition and rear wood deck at their home at 42 Villard Avenue. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-37-7 on the Village Tax Maps. Nonconformity details of the proposed portico, additions and deck are as follows: Front Portico: Front Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 20.1 ft.; Proposed – 15.8 ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.a}; Variance required – 14.2 ft. Side second story addition: Front Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 24 ft.; Proposed – 24ft.; Required Min. – 30 ft. {295 - 68F.1.a}; Variance required – 6 ft. Side Yard 2: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 8.6 ft.; Proposed – 8.6ft.; Required Min. – Two sides equaling 30’, each of which is at least 12’ {295 - 68F.1.c}; Variance required – 9.4 ft. Prohibition against extension of nonconformity {295-55.A} Rear wood deck: Side yard 1: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 5.4 ft.; Proposed – 5.4.; Required Min. – 6’ or ½ the distance of the projection into the setback (6’), whichever is least {295-20.B.6}; Variance require – .6 ft. Building Coverage: Existing and Proposed: Existing - 22.6%; Proposed - 25.6%; Required Maximum – 25% {295 – 68F.2.a [1]}; Variance required – 6/10% Developmental Coverage: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 42.9%; Proposed – 46.5%; Required Maximum – 35% {295 – 68F.2.a [2]}; Variance required – 11.5%
Case No. 13-15 Margaret Walker & Clement Paulsen 52 Buena Vista Drive Relief from the strict application of the Village code Section 295-68F.1.b & c, for construction of a new rear vestibule/kitchen addition, at their home at 52 Buena Vista Drive. Said property is in R-10 Zoning District and is also known as SBL: 4.40-43-29 on the Village Tax Maps. Non-conformity details of the proposed rear vestibule/kitchen addition are as follows: Rear Yard: Existing and Proposed: Existing – 20.1 ft.; Proposed – 17.4 ft.; Required Min. – 30% of lot depth, 28.5 ft. {295 - 68F.1.b}; Variance required - 11.1 ft.